Jul 22
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Spoiler-FREE!)
I feel so grown up right now.
I hit the Potter bandwagon a little earlier than most I think. I grew up in Ireland, and it was probably around 1999 or 98 that I think I first read “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone.” I would’ve been around 13 or 14 I guess. And I thought it was okay, and I liked the second book less than the first, but still, I thought it was okay.
When “Prisoner of Azkaban” came out in 1999, or whenever I got around to reading it, something changed I think, and J.K. Rowling hooked me (and the rest of the world). The books became scarier and more dangerous and Harry Potter was growing up with us.
Of course, with great fame comes great backlash, and being the son of a preacher man (ba-zing) I was told not to bring Potter into the house. It was, after all, evil, since it dealt with witchcraft having the potential to do good. And the fact that it was aimed at children was like bizarro-world evangelism (that was a Superman reference, and if you got it, your house gets 100 points courtesy of SAB). I snuck the books in anyway though, not because I was brewing spells under my bed late at night, but because I was right there with Harry. I was scared to death of growing up, and so was Harry, Ron and Hermione. The books were encouraging , exciting and magical. Not magical in the Satanic sense, but in the sense that Middle-Earth or Oz was magical. It was magical because it was so real, and so familiar.
Naturally, I’ve since grown quite a bit ahead of Harry. He’s just turned 17 in “Deathly Hallows,” and I myself am looking ahead at 22. He’s a high school drop out (why hasn’t anyone complained about this aspect of the book? Seriously, the biggest book series of all time has the three heroes drop out of High School. Thanks, Scholastic!) and I’m entering my last year of college. While I obviously haven’t had to face what he’s faced, we’ve all faced our own Voldemort’s and Death Eater’s over the years, haven’t we? All that stuff in Harry Potter is just surface to Rowling I think. What matters to her is her portrait of a kid struggling with growing up.
In “Deathly Hallows,” Harry has to come to terms with death, as we all must. It’s like the “Schindler’s List” in Harry Potter books at times. And by focusing on this specific theme for the last book, Rowling not only creates quite the suspenseful narrative, but also forces all of us to really think about death. The way she handles it towards the end of the book is just stunningly beautiful at times, and oddly encouraging again.
I’m 21. I’m trying to find an agent (I’m a screenwriter). I manage a movie theatre. I’m going to graduate. I want a home. I want a family. I’m really poor. I’m going to be 22. I think about death a lot more than I used to way back when “Philosopher’s Stone” came out (which also deals with death, but in that far-away-old-people-die sense). I think about these things, and I admit while reading “Deathly Hallows”, it hit close to home sometimes and I thought about my own life, and my own fear of death, and watching Harry deal with these made it somehow more comforting for me, just like watching him go through the horrors of school was for me growing up.
I don’t think Harry Potter is evil. Far from it. I think he’s impacted a generation on a far deeper level then, say, The Beatles in the sixties/seventies. I think it’s more than being the new “Lord of the Rings” (which are superiorly written and clearly better movies, but that’s not the point I’m getting at). I think it’s more important than “Pilgrim’s Progress” or “Narnia,” which I’m not saying to sound blasphemous, but that those are both fairly narrow minded in what life’s journey should be and how you should go through it.
I don’t think we’ll ever see something like Harry Potter again as long as we live. I think Harry Potter took an entire generation and became its spokesperson. The fact that it branched to a lot older than us is just testament to its themes and Rowling’s growth as a writer. But for us, for my generation, there is nothing like Harry Potter. I think in years to come we’ll see dissertations and books examining the deep pyschological reasons we all dug so deeply into Harry Potter, into Hogwarts, into whether Snape was good or evil. And really, the reason is just plainly simple:
Harry Potter is all of us. When “Philosopher’s Stone” came out, we all wished we were like him; that there was something so special about us that explained why we all felt a little different. With “Deathly Hallows,” we’re all growing up with him, Ron and Hermione, and we all just want what he wants: to live happily ever after. We might not have to take on Voldermort to achieve it, but the theme remains the same, and of course Rowling knows it. She’s known it all along, and she’s tapped more into a generation than anyone has before.
Harry Potter isn’t good or evil. He’s just a kid trying to grow up as best as he can. And it’s really hard sometimes, and it’s always going to be really hard. But it’s something that he’s got to do, and we all had the pleasure of growing up and going through it with him, which will be a treasure I forever hold dear.
We’re hopefully going to show “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” at Lost Films this fall, and I really hope that if you have a problem with this decision, you’ll do a couple things: Firstly, I’d encourage you to read the book(s) and watch the movie(s), and engage with them as the story of someone struggling with growing up. Then, if you still have problems, I’d like you to find good, hard facts about the so-called “true witchcraft” in Harry Potter. Wikipedia has a list of every spell in Harry Potter and it’s origin, check it out. Don’t believe everything you’re told by different organizations about Harry Potter, try to find out the truth for yourself. Here’s another wiki page featuring a selection of religious opposition and criticisms regarding “Harry Potter,” and responses from the likes of J.K. Rowling, Christianity Today and more.
If you still have problems with our choice at SAB, please do not hesitate to e-mail me personally at bd1187@messiah.edu. You’ll find that I’m a grown up who likes to talk like one, and I’d like nothing more than to open up a discussion on Harry Potter.
I hope you all loved the book as much as I did (it’s my favorite of the seven I believe), and I hope you all enjoyed the movie as much as I did (it’s my second favorite, after “Azkaban”). I’ll see you at Parmer Cinema this fall: I’ll be the guy dressed as Harry Potter, taking your tickets.
-Brian
1 comment1 Comment so far
I feel like all the controversy about Harry Potter is nothing more than a memory now. When the books (and films) were appealing primarily to children, there was a great hubbub about the place of witchcraft, and what we should be giving to kids for entertainment.
And to a certain degree I think that’s a legitimate concern. Kids don’t always know the difference between reality and fantasy, and for some children, Harry Potter wouldn’t really be appropriate. But that’s something that really should be up to the parents.
But that’s not true anymore. The books have been getting much more complex and their appeal has begun to skew older. The films have followed suit, with directors such as Children of Men’s Alfonso Cuaron helming more mature installments in the series.
Are they darker? yes. More mature subject matter? yes. But we aren’t children anymore. We can discern between fantasy and reality. And Harry Potter, as is shown more and more with each installment, is most definitely high fantasy. And I mean that in the best possible way.